PARTMENT OF THE NAVY
DE
BOARD
yh
FOR CORRECTIC
TOT
~
G4
U
0
Fo
yo mw
oOo BD HYOR 4
oO WL E W
mm
Ss 1
sews
M4
Ww oO G
= $2, 0) = “A
vp (ob GO mo
1 ww Y wv
rio O WH : a
os H n
U1 ne ga -Q 0 Rea
- ef OU —l rd
f 7 a oma
5 Oo aos
=| m U oO W OQ Pi
ning
+
gove
art
ort
visi
im
pro
who are retired are not eligible to transfer
benefits.
Under these circumstances, the Board found that no relief is
warranted. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon requeser.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
evidence within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of reqularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5036 14
Your application Ciditin, “Se ReGaets soo, T siqned a 1070/613 (Page 13) and also updated the system to transfer my POST 9-11 GI Bill entitlements to my dependents. pr-9> ac transferability request: anda 2, Complete e-ectron-c <= election using TEE.” The Board members furzher founc onlv change which occurred to the program, occurred w portal during affect the databases that contained the have not submitted any proof contrary to the Board members took into consideration, that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5361 14_Redacted
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 8 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case Eile. After careful and conscientious consideration of the enti record, the Board determined the letter from the Depart Veterans Affairs stating you are being treated for s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5899 14
1 \ o M H " o 3 ; cs c = . et oO ) { 1 v | oO Vv a 'O a ‘ { ct Pa a 13 a os { a J p = se ) w ¢ va OU wW 4 s 4 ud : a 1 1 O 4H Sak oO = cg a 4 Hw OO ms ‘ ul 1) $4 i oO a ee ' q U oO iJ Y a 3 i ~ w ae a y w oO ) \ , ec ; O & /) — eH ri ++ 4 1 } ans QO . oO ¢ 2 yw cof x ci a4 a 1 O-4 Oo x $} G@ O M 2 oO =A YD i io i) ri = O WH © + m4 ~~ = r { > = > = O-d ia Bon © - > za ou mM WO cl » 3 wa w oan it a Hoo @ y Oc e 1 HG El le Za HOW 6 an.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6761 14
)¢ OR i z = ce Py Oo om Pe Hw YU Q) o 4 w cd Oop GQ i St) ~ 3 uO oO O oO Mm o ow Wi @ o iW Oo 1) Ow 3 wm o i @ oH oa rc Q oO wm @ Yo aoa G fx ag Ww o Ho o,nn oD SG wy 2 Hed & OV Qa Oo HS Qo44 Hi E 1 gm O Youn o oH U Ee “cl wv 1 ~ oH ow “ ou vO rd My oy ed ri} 3. 0Ort > WO © oO G am vo 4 ) + co Up ICel beca law ed as an ea r ena 15 4 provi Docket No. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14_Redacted
Although your application was not filed in a time Board found it in the interest of justice to wai limitations and consider your application on its three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. After consulting with legal counsel, you lected to present your case to an administrative discharge board — (0 94...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6441 14
Your application claims, “I was eligible to transfer to the Flee. Reserve Pemruary oe 2011. iL was stationed at the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) at the time the Post 9/11 GI (Bjiii was enacted and consulted several individuals prior to electing to transfer to the Fleet Reserve.” Petitioner further claims that “one of those individuals was a person responsible for the approval to transfer eligibility for all Navy members at NPC. This letter states that I had an active duty date obligation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6887 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) THtle 10 U.8
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5583 14
B three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying fora correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11559 14
It is noted that the Navy Personnel Command ( contested report for 25 January to 15 March 20098 BR three-member pane sitting in executi 2OLS:. umentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11558-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 9) en) 0 ct ty fay =) to Ww CG Oh 4 PR ° Board. OD Oct fe a) K bh Wy HI Q O 5 uw jt M 0 He HO 5 0) 4 ct (D R et 4 Or LQ a ct ie D cat) K = of your oy I i om un ct o a support thereof, your naval recor Pt regulations and policies In addition, the Board con enclosed advisory opinion from Headgq ine Co careful and conscientious consideration of the a 2 Gh . H- B ct ct tn £ K S 2 of...